论辩护律师保密义务与真实义务之间的冲突与解决

defense attorney has always been a crucial figure in criminal proceedings, playing a key role in upholding justice and fairness. In the practice of law, how to resolve the dilemma of defense attorneys fulfilling their?confidentiality obligations and reconciling their confidentiality obligations with their duty to tell the truth is a problem of universal concern in the practice of law. The root cause of this conflict is mainly the dual role of defense attorneys and the different values reflected by the two obligations. Most scholars have explored the issue from the perspective of theoretical foundations and institutional construction by clarifying the boundaries between the two, thus seeking solutions to the conflict. However, there has been less discussion on specific ethical dilemmas and their resolution strategies in practical situations. Based on the analysis of the causes, this paper, drawing on the solutions adopted by Germany and the United States for the conflict between the two obligations, attempts to find measures for conflict resolution through empowerment and scenario analysis, taking into account Chinas national conditions. Defense attorneys should fulfill their confidentiality obligations based on their primary role as the defense counsel of the suspect or accused person. More importantly, the law needs to provide rights guarantees for the risks faced by defense attorneys in fulfilling their confidentiality obligations, so that they can better balance the values based on specific facts and circumstances.