Osteoblast-osteoclast co-cultures: a systematic review and map of available literature
Osteoblast-osteoclast co-cultures: a systematic review and map of available literature
Abstract Drug research with animal models is expensive, time-consuming and translation to clinical trials is often poor, resulting in a desire to replace, reduce, and refine the use of animal models. One approach to replace and reduce the use of animal models in research is using in vitro cell-culture models. To study bone physiology, bone diseases and drugs, many studies have been published using osteoblast-osteoclast co-cultures. The use of osteoblast-osteoclast co-cultures is usually not clearly mentioned in the title and abstract, making it difficult to identify these studies without a systematic search and thorough review. As a result, researchers are all developing their own methods from the ground up, leading to conceptually similar studies with many methodological differences and, as a direct consequence, incomparable results. The aim of this study was to systematically review existing osteoblast-osteoclast co-culture studies published up to 6 January 2020, and to give an overview of their methods, predetermined outcome measures (formation and resorption, and ALP and TRAP quantification as surrogate markers for formation and resorption, respectively), and other useful parameters for analysis. Information regarding these outcome measures was extracted and collected in a database, and each study was further evaluated on whether both the osteoblasts and osteoclasts were analyzed using relevant outcome measures. From these studies, additional details on methods, cells and culture conditions were extracted into a second database to allow searching on more characteristics. The two databases presented in this publication provide an unprecedented amount of information on cells, culture conditions and analytical techniques for using and studying osteoblast-osteoclast cocultures. They allow researchers to identify publications relevant to their specific needs and allow easy validation and comparison with existing literature. Finally, we provide the information and tools necessary for others to use, manipulate and expand the databases for their needs.
de Vries R.B.M.、Remmers S. J. A.、Vis M. A. M.、Hofmann S.、Ito K.、Spaander E. S. R.、de Wildt B. W. M.
SYRCLE, Department for Health Evidence, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, RadboudumcOrthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering and the Institute of Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of TechnologyOrthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering and the Institute of Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of TechnologyOrthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering and the Institute of Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of TechnologyOrthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering and the Institute of Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of TechnologyOrthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering and the Institute of Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of TechnologyOrthopaedic Biomechanics, Department of Biomedical Engineering and the Institute of Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology
医学研究方法基础医学细胞生物学
de Vries R.B.M.,Remmers S. J. A.,Vis M. A. M.,Hofmann S.,Ito K.,Spaander E. S. R.,de Wildt B. W. M..Osteoblast-osteoclast co-cultures: a systematic review and map of available literature[EB/OL].(2025-03-28)[2025-05-28].https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.09.09.459671.点此复制
评论