全球开放获取学术交流联盟平台政策、资源与服务研究

Purpose/Significance] With the continuous development of the open access (OA) movement, bibliodiversity is being analyzedand discussed within the framework of global open science strategy. In an inclusive knowledge society, information and knowledgeresources should be readily available, interpreted and utilized in appropriate languages and formats. Established in 2019, the GlobalAlliance of Open Access Scholarly Communication Platforms (GLOALL) mainly includes six national journal publishing platforms,whose establishment and promotion will become a form of bibliodiversity and open access movement. The policies, resources andservices of GLOALL's platforms reflect the emphasis on diversity in regions, languages, and academic evaluations, and are conducive tothe collision and compatibility of multiple cultures and ideas emphasized by bibliodiversity. [Method/Process] Based on the theory ofbibliodiversity research and combined with current OA practice, this paper mainly explains, compares and analyzes the policies,resources and services of GLOALL platforms. The concept of bibliodiversity was first proposed by Chilean publishers, during thecreation of the "Editores independientes de Chile" collective in the late 1990s. Besides, "the International Declaration of IndependentPublishers 2014" defined it as "cultural diversity applied to the world of books", that is, the critical diversity of products (books, scripts,eBooks, apps and oral literature) made available to readers. Re-examining the OA movement shows that OA under different paths shoulddevelop together and complement each other when necessary, rather than just encouraging and promoting one mode.[Results/Conclusions] The GLOALL platforms have similarities in strategic goals and construction principles, like promoting localscientific research, global OA and bibliodiversity. However, since each platform is not systematically constructed in a standardized wayand is aimed at different countries or regions, there are differences in specific aspects such as policy formulation, resource constructionand service operation. For this reason, these platforms are designed according to the actual situation and publishing needs of theirrespective countries, and form synergy through alliances to balance the global OA publishing pressure from some internationalpublishing groups. In essence, this publishing market emphasis on the inclusiveness of global OA. The construction experience ofGLOALL has certain reference significance for China to promote OA and build high-end academic exchange platforms. On the onehand, the GLOALL members are all national OA publishing platforms, promoting the OA movement through international cooperationto find a balance between unity and diversity, and between international development and local development. They have a positive effecton forming an academic exchange ecology that can not only develop bibliodiversity, but also support international academic research.More importantly, building platforms is a means, while exerting international influence is the goal. At present, green OA has thealliances such as COAR. While as for golden OA, in addition to transforming academic journals into OA, uniting the world's nationalopen publishing platforms is another way. Therefore, research on GLOALL in terms of policies, resources, service can help China bettergrasp the opportunities in the OA movement, fill the gaps in the current service mechanism, and explore more suitable OA modes.