|国家预印本平台
首页|Proof Scores: A Survey (full version)

Proof Scores: A Survey (full version)

Proof Scores: A Survey (full version)

来源:Arxiv_logoArxiv
英文摘要

Proof scores can be regarded as outlines of the formal verification of system properties. They have been historically used by the OBJ family of specification languages. The main advantage of proof scores is that they follow the same syntax as the specification language they are used in, so specifiers can easily adopt them and use as many features as the particular language provides. In this way, proof scores have been successfully used to prove properties of a large number of systems and protocols. However, proof scores also present a number of disadvantages that prevented a large audience from adopting them as proving mechanism. In this paper we present the theoretical foundations of proof scores; the different systems where they have been adopted and their latest developments; the classes of systems successfully verified using proof scores, including the main techniques used for it; the main reasons why they have not been widely adopted; and finally we discuss some directions of future work that might solve the problems discussed previously.

Adrian Riesco、Kazuhiro Ogata、Masaki Nakamura、Daniel Gaina、Duong Dinh Tran、Kokichi Futatsugi

10.1145/3729166

计算技术、计算机技术

Adrian Riesco,Kazuhiro Ogata,Masaki Nakamura,Daniel Gaina,Duong Dinh Tran,Kokichi Futatsugi.Proof Scores: A Survey (full version)[EB/OL].(2025-04-20)[2025-05-11].https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.14561.点此复制

评论