Keeping in Place After the Storm-Emergency Assistance and Evictions
Keeping in Place After the Storm-Emergency Assistance and Evictions
We offer evidence that federal emergency assistance (FEMA) in the days following natural disasters mitigate evictions in comparison to similar emergency scenarios where FEMA aid is not provided. We find a 16% increase in overall evictions after hurricane natural disaster events that can be decomposed to a 36% increase for those that do not receive FEMA rental assitance and only a 11% for hurricane events that do receive FEMA aid. Furthermore, we also show that FEMA aid acts as a liquidity buffer to other forms of emergency credit, specifically we find that both transactions volumes remain stable and result in a decrease in defaults by 19% in payday loans during hurricane events in locations that do receive FEMA aid. This effect largely reverses in areas that do not receive FEMA aid, where transaction volumes drop by 12\% and default rates remain similar relative to the baseline. Overall, this suggests that the availability of emergency liquidity during natural disaster events is indeed a binding constraint with real household financial consequences, in particular through our documented channel of evictions and in usage of high-cost credit.
Bilal Islah、Ahmed Zoulati
灾害、灾害防治财政、金融
Bilal Islah,Ahmed Zoulati.Keeping in Place After the Storm-Emergency Assistance and Evictions[EB/OL].(2025-05-20)[2025-06-19].https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.14548.点此复制
评论