小麦-玉米不同种植制度的耗水特征与产量响应
为解决河北平原地下水漏斗区传统冬小麦-夏玉米一年两熟种植制度面临的水粮矛盾问题,本试验通过优化灌溉制度和探索替代节水种植模式,旨在筛选出适合该地区的节水稳粮型种植制度。试验以常规灌溉冬小麦-夏玉米一年两熟(WM-CK)为对照,设置雨养旱作冬小麦-夏玉米一年两熟(WM-R)、冬小麦/夏玉米-春玉米两年三熟(WMM)和春玉米一年一熟(M)种植制度,共4个处理。对不同种植模式的产量、生物量、水资源利用效率以及土壤水分的时空动态变化进行系统分析。结果表明:与常规灌溉相比,雨养旱作冬小麦平均产量降低27.1%,两年周年产量分别降低了17.1%和4.5%,一年两熟雨养旱作处理轮作周期总产量较常规灌溉降低了10.8%,两年三熟和一年一熟总产量较传统一年两熟分别降低27.2%和51.4%。一年两熟常规灌溉农田水分亏损两年累计达745.1 mm,雨养旱作处理减少农田水分亏损59.4%。与传统一年两熟相比,两年三熟和一年一熟分别减少农田水分亏损34.5%和75.3%。轮作周期雨养旱作一年两熟较常规灌溉耗水量减少416.3 mm,且水分利用效率提高12.8%。两年三熟较一年两熟常规灌溉总耗水量减少493.3 mm,由于第二年单季春玉米产量显著降低,水分利用效率未能显著提高。综上所述,一年两熟雨养旱作模式和两年三熟种植制度均能在保障产量损失较少的情况下有效缓解地下水消耗问题,可作为河北平原地区缓解水资源危机与稳定粮食生产的新型种植模式。
o address the water-grain contradiction faced by the traditional winter wheat-summer maize double cropping system in the groundwater funnel areas of the North China Plain, this study optimized irrigation regimes and explored alternative water-saving cropping patterns to identify suitable water-saving and grain-stabilizing cropping systems for the region. The study used conventional irrigated winter wheat-summer maize double cropping (WM-CK) as the control and established three other treatments: rainfed winter wheat-summer maize double cropping (WM-R), winter wheat/summer maize-spring maize relay cropping over two years (WMM), and spring maize monocropping (M). The yield, biomass, water use efficiency, and spatiotemporal dynamics of soil moisture were systematically analyzed across different cropping patterns. Results showed that compared with conventional irrigation, the average yield of rainfed winter wheat decreased by 27.1%, and the total yields over two consecutive years decreased by 17.1% and 4.5%, respectively. The total yield of the rainfed double cropping system over the rotation cycle was 10.8% lower than that of conventional irrigation. The total yields of the two-year-three-crop and one-year-one-crop systems were 27.2% and 51.4% lower than those of the traditional double cropping system, respectively. The cumulative soil water deficit in the conventionally irrigated double cropping fields reached 745.1 mm over two years. The rainfed cropping system reduced the soil water deficit by 59.4%. Compared with the traditional double cropping system, the two-year-three-crop and one-year-one-crop systems reduced the soil water deficit by 34.5% and 75.3%, respectively. Over the rotation cycle, the rainfed double cropping system consumed 416.3 mm less water than conventional irrigation and increased water use efficiency by 12.8%. The two-year-three-crop system consumed 493.3 mm less water than the conventionally irrigated double cropping system. However, due to the significant reduction in yield of the single spring maize crop in the second year, the water use efficiency did not increase significantly. In conclusion, both the rainfed cropping pattern and the two-year-three-crop system can effectively alleviate the problem of groundwater depletion with minimal yield loss, and can be considered as new cropping models for mitigating the water resource crisis and stabilizing grain production in the North China Plain.
郭盈盈、杜雄
河北农业大学农学院,华北作物改良与调控国家重点实验室,河北保定 071000河北农业大学农学院,华北作物改良与调控国家重点实验室,河北保定 071000
农作物环境科学理论
小麦玉米种植制度产量水分利用
wheatmaizecropping systemgrain yieldwater use
郭盈盈,杜雄.小麦-玉米不同种植制度的耗水特征与产量响应[EB/OL].(2025-05-22)[2025-05-24].http://www.paper.edu.cn/releasepaper/content/202505-136.点此复制
评论