科研人员数据伦理失范行为形成过程及影响因素研究
Study on the Formation Process and Influencing Factors of Data Ethical Misconduct by Researchers
[目的]分析科研人员在数据处理和分析过程中数据伦理失范行为的形成过程及影响因素， 旨在揭示伦理失范行为形成规律，为改进科研伦理规范和优化科研管理提供理论支持。 [方法]对25个半结构化访谈文本及网络相关主题文本进行混合数据的扎根理论分析，构建 科研人员数据伦理失范行为形成过程及影响因素模型。 [结论]数据伦理认知是科研人员伦理判断与规范遵循的基础；科研人员的伦理决策存在道 义与效用的动态博弈：既可能在规范明确、监督完善时呈现道义论主导的“规范内化”，也 可能在资源竞争激烈时出现目的论驱动的伦理失范行为；情境因素的结构性矛盾与情景因 素的即时压力形成共振效应，促使宏观制度缺陷转化为微观失范行为；自我调节与外部控 制构成双重防线，但效力依赖情境支持。
科学、科学研究信息传播、知识传播
科学数据伦理 伦理失范行为 科研人员 扎根理论
孙俐丽,张潭,金咏诗.科研人员数据伦理失范行为形成过程及影响因素研究[EB/OL].(2025-07-18)[2025-09-29].https://chinaxiv.org/abs/202507.00426.点此复制
[Objective] This paper analyzes the formation process and influencing factors of data ethical misconduct of scientific researchers in the process of data processing and analysis, aiming at revealing the patterns of formation of ethical misconduct, and providing theoretical support for the improvement of research ethics guidelines and optimization of scientific research management. [Method] Based on the grounded theory analysis of mixed data from 25 semi structured interview texts and related online topic texts, this paper constructs a model of the formation process and influencing factors of data ethical misconduct behavior of scientific researchers. [Conclusions] Data ethics cognition forms the foundation for researchers ethical judgment and adherence to normative standards. Researchers ethical decision-making entails a dynamic interplay between deontological and teleological considerations: under conditions of clear norms and robust oversight, deontological imperatives lead to norm internalization, whereas in intensely competitive resource environments, teleologically driven ethical misconduct may occur. The resonance between the structural contradictions of contextual factors and immediate situational pressures facilitates the transformation of macro-level institutional deficiencies into micro-level ethical deviations. Self-regulation and external controls serve as dual defensive mechanisms, although their effectiveness is contingent upon contextual support.
Scientific data ethics Ethical misconduct Scientific researchers Grounded Theory
展开英文信息
评论