Volatility Modeling with Rough Paths: A Signature-Based Alternative to Classical Expansions

We compare two methodologies for calibrating implied volatility surfaces: a second-order asymptotic expansion method derived via Malliavin calculus, and a data-driven approach based on path signatures from rough path theory. The former, developed in Alòs et al. (2015), yields efficient and accurate calibration formulas under the assumption that the asset price follows a Heston-type stochastic volatility model. The latter models volatility as a linear functional of the signature of a primary stochastic process, enabling a flexible approximation without requiring a specific parametric form. Our numerical experiments show that the signature-based method achieves calibration accuracy comparable to the asymptotic approach when the true dynamics are Heston. We then test the model in a more general setting where the asset follows a rough Bergomi volatility process-a regime beyond the scope of the asymptotic expansion-and show that the signature approach continues to deliver accurate results. These findings highlight the model-independence, robustness and adaptability of signature-based calibration methods in settings where volatility exhibits rough or non-Markovian features.