Most certainly certain? The Impact of Contract for Difference Design on Renewables' Strike Prices and Electricity Market Risks
Silke Johanndeiter Jonas Finke Justus Heuer
作者信息
Abstract
Weather, technological and regulatory uncertainties expose actors in highly renewable electricity markets to substantial price and volume risks. Two-way Contracts for Difference (CfDs) can mitigate these risks. They stipulate payments between the government and generators of renewable electricity based on the difference of a strike and a reference price, whose definition and unit of payment differ between CfD designs. We study the effect of three different CfD designs on wind power profit and consumer price volatility under the consideration of uncertain market outcomes in a highly renewable, sector-coupled electricity market. First, we analytically derive optimal strike prices under uncertainty. Second, we numerically determine optimal strike prices based on market expectations retrieved from optimising a set of 36 market scenarios in an energy system model. Third, we study the distribution of ex post market revenues, CfD payments and consumer prices across all 36 scenarios. Compared to purely market-based consumer prices and investor profits, we find all CfDs to significantly reduce volatility. For consumer prices, results show no substantial differences between CfD designs. For investor profits, we identify the highest volatility reduction under a capacity-based CfD with a reference price similar to power plants' individual market revenues. Since such a CfD design is known to diminish the effect of price signals on investment decisions, our results reveal a trade-off between incentivising system-friendliness and reducing investor risk.引用本文复制引用
Silke Johanndeiter,Jonas Finke,Justus Heuer.Most certainly certain? The Impact of Contract for Difference Design on Renewables' Strike Prices and Electricity Market Risks[EB/OL].(2025-12-19)[2026-01-16].https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.17508.学科分类
能源动力工业经济/风能、风力机械
评论