空间位置比非空间特征更难从工作记忆中移除
Spatial Location is Harder to Remove from Working Memory than Non-spatial Features
任国防 1丁晓伟 2张颖超 2王盛元2
作者信息
- 1. 安阳师范学院教育学院，河南，安阳 455000
- 2. 中山大学心理学系，广东，广州 510006
- 折叠
摘要
从工作记忆中移除无关信息有助于高效利用其有限资源。关于工作记忆移除信息的研究均聚焦于非空间特征的移除，而空间特征(如位置信息)在认知理论的特殊性存在争议。因此在工作记忆移除信息的视角下考察空间特征是否特殊具有理论必要性。为回答上述问题，本文直接对比工作记忆中空间特征与非空间特征的移除，并提出两个假设：空间特征相比非空间特征更难移除(位置特异假设)或二者移除难度相当(位置非特异假设)。实验中被试需记忆一个多特征客体(包含空间和非空间信息)，保持阶段根据线索提示移除任务无关特征，仅保留任务相关特征，检测阶段操纵任务无关信息的变化。核心逻辑在于若任务无关特征从工作记忆中有效移除，则其在检测任务中发生变化不会影响任务相关特征的记忆绩效；反之记忆绩效则会受影响。两实验结果一致显示，相比非空间特征，空间特征作为任务无关特征变化时对记忆绩效干扰更大。这表明，空间位置比非空间特征更难从工作记忆中移除，支持位置特异假设。
Abstract
Working memory (WM) is a limited-capacity system, its functioning relies heavily on the ability to remove no-longer-relevant information. While previous research has primarily focused on the removal of entire objects, it remains unclear whether all features within an object share a common fate during removal. In particular, given the privileged status of spatial location across various cognitive processes, it is an open question whether location information is treated differently during removal. To answer this question, we directly compared the removal of spatial and non-spatial features from WM. We proposed two competing hypotheses: The location-specific hypothesis assumed that spatial location was more difficult to remove from WM than non-spatial features, due to its central role in object representation. In contrast, the location-non-specific hypothesis assumed that spatial and non-spatial features share similar removal difficulties.To test these hypotheses, we conducted two experiments with 55 participants (N = 26 in Experiment 1; N = 29 in Experiment 2). We employed a newly developed paradigm combining retro-cue with a change-detection task. On each trial, participants memorized a single object defined by multiple features (e.g., color and location). After a 500-ms delay, a retro-cue indicated the task-relevant feature, and participants were explicitly instructed to remove the uncued feature from WM. Following a 1000-ms delay, a probe appeared, and participants judged whether the cued feature had changed. Crucially, the uncued (task-irrelevant) feature changed in 50% of the trials, allowing us to quantify residual interference from information that should have been removed.The critical measure was the interference effect, defined as the difference in reaction time (RTs) between trials with and without a change in the task-irrelevant feature. If removal is successful, changes in the task-irrelevant feature should produce little or no interference. In Experiment 1, we observed greater interference when spatial location was the task-irrelevant feature compared to when a non-spatial feature was irrelevant. This finding supports the location-specific hypothesis. However, because different feature types were tested under separate task conditions, it remained possible that the observed difference reflected task-related confounds (e.g., differing task difficulty). To address this concern, we conducted experiment 2, which tested spatial and non-spatial features within a unified task structure, eliminating between-condition differences. The results replicated those of Experiment 1: changes to task-irrelevant locations produced reliable interference, whereas changes to task-irrelevant non-spatial features did not.Across both experiments, we found consistent evidence that spatial location is more difficult to remove from WM than non-spatial features. This finding supports location-specific hypothesis. Taken together, our study supported the privileged status of spatial location in WM removal.关键词
工作记忆/空间位置/工作记忆移除Key words
working memory/spatial location/working memory removal引用本文复制引用
任国防,丁晓伟,张颖超,王盛元.空间位置比非空间特征更难从工作记忆中移除[EB/OL].(2026-01-14)[2026-04-03].https://chinaxiv.org/abs/202601.00117.学科分类
人类学
评论