|国家预印本平台
| 注册
首页|国内外算力网与电力网、通信网建设及运营模式比较研究

国内外算力网与电力网、通信网建设及运营模式比较研究

景春梅 张建红 李泓锟

istic_logo国家预印本平台

国内外算力网与电力网、通信网建设及运营模式比较研究

A Comparative Study on the Construction and Operation Models of Computing Power Networks with Power Grids and Communication Networks in China and Abroad

景春梅 1张建红 2李泓锟2

作者信息

  • 1. 中国国际经济交流中心
  • 2. 中国国际工程咨询有限公司
  • 折叠

摘要

算力网建设与运营模式尚在探索成形之中。本文以“资源供给侧—网络传输侧—调度运营侧—终端需求侧”的功能同构框架为分析工具,系统比较了国内外算力网与电力网、通信网在建设主体、投资机制、网络治理、调度交易、价格形成与普遍服务等方面的制度安排。研究发现:中国算力网建设呈现“国家战略牵引+多元主体共建”的特征,“东数西算”工程与全国一体化算力网布局在逻辑上继承了电网“西电东送”与通信网“普遍服务”的举国体制经验;美国算力基础设施以科技巨头市场化投资为主导,欧盟则采取“联合事业+分层访问”的公私合营模式,与中国“枢纽集群+统一调度”模式形成鲜明对照;算力网因其资源的可储存性、任务的时空可迁移性以及标准的未收敛性,不能完全照搬电网与通信网模式,应走“算电协同、算网融合、统一度量、分层运营”的差异化道路。最后,从规划统筹、市场建设、价格机制、普遍服务与绿色协同五个方面提出政策建议。

Abstract

The construction and operational model of the computing power network is still under exploration and formation. Using the functional isomorphic framework of "resource supply side—network transmission side—scheduling and operation side—terminal demand side" as an analytical tool, this paper systematically compares the institutional arrangements of domestic and international computing power networks with power grids and communication networks in terms of construction entities, investment mechanisms, network governance, scheduling and trading, price formation, and universal service. The study finds that China's computing power network construction exhibits the characteristics of "national strategic guidance plus multi-entity joint construction," with the "East Data West Computing" project and the nationwide integrated computing power network layout logically inheriting the national system experience of power grids' "West Power East Delivery" and communication networks' "universal service." In contrast, the U.S. computing power infrastructure is primarily driven by market-oriented investments from tech giants, while the EU adopts a public-private partnership model of "joint ventures plus hierarchical access," forming a stark contrast to China's "hub clusters plus unified scheduling" model. Due to the storable nature of computing power resources, the spatial-temporal transferability of tasks, and the non-convergent standards, the computing power network cannot entirely replicate the models of power grids and communication networks. Instead, it should follow a differentiated path of "computing-electricity synergy, computing-network convergence, unified measurement, and hierarchical operation." Finally, policy recommendations are proposed from five aspects: planning coordination, market development, pricing mechanisms, universal service, and green synergy.

关键词

算力网/电力网/通信网/基础设施建设/运营模式/比较研究

Key words

Computing power network/ Power grid/ Communication network/ Infrastructure construction/ Operation model/ comparative study

引用本文复制引用

景春梅,张建红,李泓锟.国内外算力网与电力网、通信网建设及运营模式比较研究[EB/OL].(2026-09-08)[2026-09-08].https://sinoxiv.napstic.cn/article/26161505.

学科分类

经济计划、经济管理
首发时间 2026-09-08 10:49:16
下载量:0
|
点击量:9
段落导航相关论文