|国家预印本平台
| 注册
首页|GenAI赋能古籍数字化的可信度评估与可信治理策略研究

GenAI赋能古籍数字化的可信度评估与可信治理策略研究

付雅明 孙炫宇

GenAI赋能古籍数字化的可信度评估与可信治理策略研究

Research on Credibility Assessment and Credibility Governance Strategies for GenAI-Enabled Ancient Book Digitization

付雅明 1孙炫宇1

作者信息

  • 1. 上海大学文化遗产与信息管理学院,上海 200444
  • 折叠

摘要

生成式人工智能(Generative Artificial Intelligence,GenAI)在赋能公共图书馆古籍数字化的同时,也带来了数据失真、模型“幻觉”与权责模糊等可信风险,故亟须加强系统性可信治理。本研究首先分析GenAI赋能古籍数字化过程中引发的可信风险,并构建适配古籍特性的涵盖基础层、内容层、知识层与服务层的可信度评估框架;然后,据此构建包含13项评估指标的GenAI赋能古籍数字化可信度评估指标体系,实现对生成内容的结构化、可操作的可信度评估;最后,提出建立分层响应机制、加强资源分级管理与权责协同的制度保障、构建可信治理长效机制三个方面的可信治理策略,形成“可信风险分析—可信度评估—可信治理”的完整闭环,旨在为GenAI在古籍数字化过程中的合规化、高质量的应用提供理论与实践参考。

Abstract

While empowering public libraries in ancient book digitization, Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) also introduces credibility risks such as data distortion, model 'hallucination', and ambiguous accountability, necessitating systematic credibility governance. This study first analyzes the credibility risks arising from the GenAI-enabled ancient book digitization process and constructs a credibility assessment framework tailored to the characteristics of ancient books, covering the foundational layer, content layer, knowledge layer, and service layer. Subsequently, based on this framework, a credibility assessment indicator system for GenAI-enabled ancient book digitization containing 13 evaluation indicators is established to achieve structured and actionable credibility assessment of generated content. Finally, credibility governance strategies are proposed in three aspects: establishing a tiered response mechanism, strengthening institutional safeguards for resource classification management and accountability coordination, and constructing a long-term mechanism for credibility governance. This forms a complete closed loop of 'credibility risk analysis—credibility assessment—credibility governance,' aiming to provide theoretical and practical references for the compliant and high-quality application of GenAI in the ancient book digitization process.

关键词

GenAI/古籍数字化/可信风险/可信度评估/可信治理

Key words

GenAI/Ancient Book Digitization/Credibility Risk/Credibility Assessment/Credibility Governance

引用本文复制引用

付雅明,孙炫宇.GenAI赋能古籍数字化的可信度评估与可信治理策略研究[EB/OL].(2026-09-09)[2026-09-10].https://sinoxiv.napstic.cn/article/26161520.

学科分类

信息传播、知识传播
首发时间 2026-09-09 10:51:09
下载量:2
|
点击量:21
段落导航相关论文