|国家预印本平台
首页|知识可视化设计研究脉络分析

知识可视化设计研究脉络分析

Scheme analysis of knowledge visualization design research

中文摘要英文摘要

目的 知识可视化设计研究综述反映了人们对知识新形式的探索路径。 文献范围 国外文献来自Web of Science的核心合集数据库论文1377篇。国内文献来自知网518篇论文数据。 方法 研究借助文献计量分析工具Vosview、Citespace 以及自主梳理方法,以“知识可视化设计”为关键词对1985-2022年间国内外文献进行检索和分析,解析了知识可视化设计研究的辩证发展路径。 结果 发现目前可视化定义研究的局限,研究对知识可视化设计的本体论和认识论上缺乏思考,以及过于依赖单一的研究视角缺乏辩证思维。 局限 由于国内外数据库不统一较难用同种方法进行统一分析。 结论 中国知识可视化设计者和研究者应用唯物辩证法把握知识可视化设计领域研究脉络和规律,了解其辩证发展过程,找到中国知识可视化领域的发展道路。

  Objective  The review of knowledge visualization design reflects the ways of exploring new forms of knowledge. Coverage There are 1377 papers from the core collection database of Web of Science. The domestic literature comes from 518 papers on CNKI.  Methods Using bibliometric analysis tools Vosview, Citespace and self-combing methods, this study retrieved and analyzed domestic and foreign literature from 1985 to 2022 with the keyword knowledge visualization design , and analyzed the dialectical development path of knowledge visualization design research. Results  It is found that the current research on visual definition is limited, the research lacks consideration on the ontology and epistemology of knowledge visual design, and relies too much on a single research perspective and lacks dialectical thinking. Limitation  It is difficult to use the same method for unified analysis due to the inconsistency of domestic and foreign databases. Conclusion  Chinese knowledge visualization designers and researchers use materialist dialectics to grasp the research context and law of knowledge visualization design field, understand its dialectical development process, and find the development path of knowledge visualization field in China.

10.12074/202404.00227V1

信息传播、知识传播科学、科学研究自然科学研究方法

知识可视化设计文献分析策略唯物辩证法

esign of Knowledge visualizationliterature analysisStrategyMaterialist dialectics

.知识可视化设计研究脉络分析[EB/OL].(2024-04-18)[2025-08-02].https://chinaxiv.org/abs/202404.00227.点此复制

评论