Designing and implementing state-level fertility preservation health insurance benefit mandates
Designing and implementing state-level fertility preservation health insurance benefit mandates
Abstract ObjectiveTo describe the design and implementation of state-level fertility preservation (FP) health insurance benefit mandates and regulation and to provide stakeholders with guidance on best practices, gaps, and implementation needs. DesignLegal mapping and implementation framework-guided analysis SettingU.S. states with state-level fertility preservation health insurance benefit mandates Patient(s)Individuals at risk of iatrogenic infertility Intervention(s)State laws mandating health insurance benefit coverage for fertility preservation services. Main Outcome Measure(s)Design features of FP mandated benefit legislation; implementation process Result(s)Between June, 2017 and March, 2021, 11 states passed FP benefit mandate laws. On average, states took 223 days to implement their mandates from the start of the laws’ enactment dates to their corresponding effective dates, and a majority issued regulatory guidance after the law was in effect. Significant variation was observed in which FP services were specified for inclusion or exclusion in the laws and/or regulator guidance. Federal policies impacted state level implementation, with the ACA and HIPAA guiding design of fertility preservation benefits. In addition, a majority of states referenced medical society clinical practice guidelines in the design of FP mandated benefits. ConclusionsOur policy scan documented significant variation in the design and implementation of health insurance benefit mandates for FP services. Future considerations for policy development include specificity and flexibility of benefit design, reference to external clinical practice guidelines to drive benefit coverage, inclusion of Medicaid populations in required coverage, and consideration of interaction with relevant state and federal policies. In addition, key considerations for implementation include the sufficient length of time for the implementation period, regulator guidance issued prior to the law going into effect, and explicit allocation of resources for the implementation process.
Kaiser Bonnie N.、Su H. Irene、McMenamin Sara B.、Mesina Omar、Flores Ricardo E.、Yoeun Sara W.
Department of Anthropology and Global Health Program, University of CaliforniaDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Services, University of California||Moores Cancer Center, University of California, San Diego, 3855 Health Sciences DriveHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health, 9500 Gilman Drive #0725, La Jolla, CA 92093-0725, University of CaliforniaDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Services, University of CaliforniaHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health, 9500 Gilman Drive #0725, La Jolla, CA 92093-0725, University of CaliforniaHerbert Wertheim School of Public Health, 9500 Gilman Drive #0725, La Jolla, CA 92093-0725, University of California
医药卫生理论医学研究方法法律
Fertility preservationstate benefit mandateshealth insurance coverageoncofertility
Kaiser Bonnie N.,Su H. Irene,McMenamin Sara B.,Mesina Omar,Flores Ricardo E.,Yoeun Sara W..Designing and implementing state-level fertility preservation health insurance benefit mandates[EB/OL].(2025-03-28)[2025-08-02].https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.06.13.21258849.点此复制
评论