基于蒙特利尔认知评定量表双阈值的卒中后认知“恢复者”神经心理学变化研究
Neuropsychological Changes of Cognitive Reverters after Stroke Based on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)with a Double Threshold
背景 卒中后患者的认知功能是动态变化的,但关于卒中后认知“恢复”的研究较少,且尚无研究对“恢复者”定义及不同定义下的神经心理学特征进行分析比较。目的 探究基于传统定义与 MoCA 双阈值新定义下卒中患者认知恢复者神经心理学特征。方法 选取 2020 年 12 月至 2022 年 2 月在河北医科大学第二医院神经内科住院的首发急性缺血性卒中患者 163 例为研究对象。基线时采用蒙特利尔认知评定量表(MoCA)评估患者卒中急性期认知功能。卒中后 6 个月随访时再次评估认知功能,同时完善详细的神经心理学测试,包括数字广度测验(DST)、Stroop色词测验 C(Stroop C)、波士顿命名测试(BNT)中文版、言语流畅性试验(VFT)、画钟试验(CDT)、听觉词语学习测验(AVLT)。一方面依据 MoCA 双阈值(20/21、25/26)将患者分为 M1、M2、M3 三组,即 MoCA 评分 <21 分为 M1 组、MoCA 评分≥ 26 分为 M3 组、其余为 M2 组。另一方面依据两种“恢复者”定义将患者分为恢复者 1 组(R1组)与非恢复者 1 组(NR1 组)、R2 组与 NR2 组。结果 6 个月后对患者进行随访,其中 28 例失访,最终纳入 135例为研究对象。135 例患者平均卒中急性期 MoCA 评分(20.1±5.1)分。卒中后 6 个月时 M1 组 40 例、M2 组 61 例、M3 组 34 例。M2 组、M3 组患者卒中后 6 个月 MoCA 评分、正向 DST 评分、逆向 DST 评分、DST 总分、Stroop C 耗时、BNT 中文版评分、VFT- 动物、VFT- 水果、VFT- 蔬菜、CDT 评分、AVLT- 即刻评分、AVLT- 短延迟、AVLT- 长延迟、AVLT- 再认评分均高于 M1 组,Stroop C 错误数少于 M1 组(P<0.05);M3 组患者卒中后 6 个月 MoCA 评分、逆向 DST 评分、DST 总分、CDT 评分、AVLT- 短延迟、AVLT- 长延迟高于 M2 组(P<0.05)。135 例患者中 120 例患者卒中急性期 MoCA 评分 <26 分,作为本部分研究对象。与卒中急性期 MoCA 评分相比,73 例患者随访期提高≥ 2 分者为 R1 组,47 例患者提高 <2 分为 NR1 组,恢复率为 60.8%(73/120)。R1 组患者卒中急性期 MoCA 评分低于 NR1 组,随访期 MoCA 评分高于 NR1 组(P<0.05)。与卒中急性期 MoCA 双阈值分类相比,50 例随访期评分增加并跨类为 R2组,70 例未跨类为 NR2 组,恢复率为 41.7%(50/120)。R2 组患者卒中急性期 MoCA 评分、随访期 MoCA 评分、逆向 DST 评分、DST 总分、BNT 中文版评分、VFT- 蔬菜、CDT 评分、AVLT- 即刻评分、AVLT- 短延迟、AVLT- 长延迟、AVLT- 再认评分高于 NR1 组,Stroop C 耗时、Stroop C 错误数、VFT- 动物低于 NR1 组(P<0.05)。结论 卒中后患者注意力、视空间功能及延迟回忆存在不同程度受损。传统定义下,恢复者与非恢复者组评分神经心理学测试差异不大。而基于 MoCA 双阈值的新定义,恢复者评分较高,更具有临床使用意义。
Background Cognitive function is dynamic in post-stroke patientshoweverthere are limited studies on cognitive recovery after stroke. The definition of cognitive reverters and neuropsychological characteristics according to various definitions have not yet been investigated. Objective To investigate the neuropsychological characteristics of cognitive reverters?after stroke based on the traditional definition and new definition according to Montreal Cognitive Assessment MoCA with a double threshold. Methods A total of 163 patients hospitalized for first onset acute ischemic stroke were recruited from the Department of Neurology of the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University from December 2020 to February 2022as the study subjects. All patients were assessed for cognitive function in the acute period of ischemic stroke using the MoCA at baseline. Cognitive function was assessed again at the 6-month post-stroke follow-up with the detailed neuropsychological tests refined at the same timeincluding the digit span task DSTStroop color and word test SCWTChinese version of Boston naming test BNTverbal fluency testVFTclock drawing testCDTand auditory verbal learning testAVLT. The enrolled patients were divided into the M1 group MoCA scores <21M2 group 21 ≤ MoCA scores ≤ 25and M3 group MoCA scores ≥ 26according to the MoCA with adouble threshold. While the patients were also divided into the reverters 1R1 groupnonreverters 1NR1 groupR2group and NR2 group according to the two definitions of reverters. Results Patients were followed up after 6 monthsof which 28 were lost to follow-up and 135 were finally included in the study. The average MoCA score in the acute period of stroke was 20.1±5.1 in 135 patients. There were 40 cases in the M1 group61 cases in the M2 group and 34 cases in the M3 group. The scores of the MoCAforward DSTreverse DSTtotal DSTChinese version of BNTCDTStroop C time consumingnumbers of VFT-animalVFT-fruit and VFT-vegetableAVLT-immediate scoresAVLTshort delay scoresAVLT-long delay scores and AVLT-recognition scores in the M2 and M3 groups6 months after stroke were higher than the M1 groupP<0.05.The scores of the MoCAreverse DSTtotal DSTAVLT-short delay score and AVLTlong delay score in the M3 group than the M2 groupP<0.05.120 patients of the 135 patients with MoCA scores<26 in the acute period of ischemic stroke were selected as the study subjects. Compared with the MoCA scores during the acute period of ischemic stroke73 patients improved ≥ 2 points during the follow-up period in the R1 group and 47 patients improved <2 points in the NR1 groupwith a recovery rate of 60.8% 73/120.Patients in the R1 group had lower MoCA scores in the acute period of ischemic stroke than the NR1 groupand higher MoCA scores in the follow-up period than the NR1 group P< 0.05.Compared with the double threshold classification of MoCA in the acute period of stroke50 cases had increased scores and crossed over to the R2 group and 70 cases did not cross over to the NR2 group at follow-upwith a recovery rate of 41.7% 50/120.Patients in the R2 group had higher MoCA score in the acute period of strokeMoCA scoresreverse DST scorestotal DST scoresChinese version of BNT scoresVFT-vegetable numberCDT scoresAVLT-immediate scoresAVLT-short delay scoresAVLT-long delay scoresand AVLT-recognition scores during follow-up were higher than the NR1 groupand the Stroop C time consumingnumbers of Stroop C errors and VFT-animals were lower than the NR1 group P<0.05. Conclusion There are varying degrees of impairment in attentionvisuospatial function and delayed recall in post-stroke patients. There is no significant difference in neuropsychological characteristics between reverters and nonreverters. Howeverthe scores of reverters are higher based on the definition using double threshold for MoCA scoreswhich is more relevant for clinical use.
刘琦、刘亚玲、董惠、刘月
10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0885
神经病学、精神病学临床医学内科学
缺血性卒中认知障碍神经心理学精神状态和痴呆测验功能恢复注意力记忆
Ischemic strokeognition disordersNeuropsychologyMental status and dementia testsRecovery of functionttentionMemory
刘琦,刘亚玲,董惠,刘月.基于蒙特利尔认知评定量表双阈值的卒中后认知“恢复者”神经心理学变化研究[EB/OL].(2023-05-05)[2025-08-16].https://chinaxiv.org/abs/202305.00020.点此复制
评论