|国家预印本平台
首页|四种缺血性卒中复发风险评分系统的性别差异

四种缺血性卒中复发风险评分系统的性别差异

Gender Difference of Four Ischemic Stroke Scoring System

中文摘要英文摘要

缺血性卒中的复发预测主要依赖于一些基于危险因素的评分模型,但总体预测效度并不十分让人满意。目前常用的评分大多未纳入性别这一复发危险因素,可能是影响预测效度的因素之一。性激素等男女间固有的差异可能是卒中复发的独立危险因素。同时,男女对某一危险因素的不同耐受性,如男性对于糖尿病、高血压病等危险因素可能具有更好的耐受性,同样可能影响评分的效度。因此本文将就缺血性卒中四种典型复发预测评分系统(CHADS2评分、CHA2DS2-VASc评分、Essen 卒中风险评分以及ABCD2评分)各项及整体评价效度的性别差异予以综述。

In general, recurrence prediction of ischemic stroke relies on scoring models based on risk factors, but the overall predictive validity is barely satisfactory. Gender, as one of risk factors of recurrence, has not been included in most scoring systems yet, which might be one of the impacting factors to predictive validity. Inherent differences, such as sex hormone, between male and female may be the independent risk factors of stroke recurrence. Meanwhile, different tolerance to a specific risk factor between male and female may also affect the predictive validity; for instance, male have better tolerance to risk factors including diabetes and hypertension. Therefore, this paper makes analysis to gender differences in evaluative validity of each item and overall effect among the four major recurrence prediction scoring systems for ischemic stroke (including CHADS2 scoring system, CHA2DS2-VASc scoring system, Essen stoke risk scoring system and ABCD2 risk scoring system).

李国忠、陈洪苹、钟镝、薛洋

神经病学、精神病学

缺血性卒中复发评分系统性别差异

ischemic strokerecurrencescoring systemgender difference

李国忠,陈洪苹,钟镝,薛洋.四种缺血性卒中复发风险评分系统的性别差异[EB/OL].(2016-07-08)[2025-08-05].http://www.paper.edu.cn/releasepaper/content/201607-117.点此复制

评论