A scoping review of behavioural science approaches and frameworks for health protection and emergency response
A scoping review of behavioural science approaches and frameworks for health protection and emergency response
Abstract AimRapid intervention development, implementation and evaluation is required for emergency public health contexts, such as the recent COVID-19 pandemic. A novel Agile Co-production and Evaluation (ACE) framework has been developed to assist this endeavour in future public health emergencies. This scoping review aimed to map available behavioural science resources that can be used to develop and evaluate public health guidance, messaging, and interventions in emergency contexts onto components of ACE: rapid development and implementation, co-production with patients or the public including seldom heard voices from diverse communities, and inclusion of evaluation. MethodsA scoping review methodology was used. Searches were run on MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychInfo, and Google, with search terms covering emergency response and behavioural science. Papers published since 2014 and which discussed a framework or guidance for using behavioural science in response to a public health emergency, were included. A narrative synthesis was conducted. ResultsSeventeen records were included in the synthesis. The records covered a range of emergency contexts, the most frequent of which were COVID-19 (n=7) and non-specific emergencies (n=4). One record evaluated existing tools, six proposed new tools, and ten described existing tools. Commonly used tools included the Behavioural Change Wheel, Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Behaviour model (COM-B model) and social identity theory. Three records discuss co-production with the target audience and consideration of diverse populations. Four records incorporate rapid testing, evaluation, or validation methods. Six records state that their tool is designed to be implemented rapidly. No records cover all components of ACE. ConclusionWe recommend that future research explores how to create guidance involving rapid implementation, co-production with patients or the public including seldom-heard voices from diverse communities, and evaluation.
Zelenka Martin Alice、French Clare、Weston Dale、Kesten Jo
MSc Public Health student, University of BristolNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation at the University of BristolNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation at the University of Bristol. Behavioural Science and Insights Unit, UK Health Security Agency NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Emergency Preparedness and Response at King?ˉs College London. NIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Modelling and Health Economics at Imperial College LondonNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Behavioural Science and Evaluation, and NIHR Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) West at the University of Bristol
医学研究方法预防医学灾害、灾害防治
behavioural insightsemergency responsehealth protection
Zelenka Martin Alice,French Clare,Weston Dale,Kesten Jo.A scoping review of behavioural science approaches and frameworks for health protection and emergency response[EB/OL].(2025-03-28)[2025-07-16].https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2023.05.19.23290226.点此复制
评论