学术出版领域关于AI工具使用的应对策略探析——以ChatGPT为例

Purpose/significance] To analyze the attitudes, measures and policies of the current academic publishing community in the face of artificial intelligenceAI tools represented by ChatGPT, and to provide reference for the construction of academic publishing policy system in the context of AI4Science.[Method/process] The policies/statements of academic publishers on the use of AI tools were systematically scanned and analyzed by using the internet/literature research method and content analysis method. [Result/conclusion] Different academic publishers respond to the use of AI tools at different speeds, but their concerns and key policy factors are relatively consistent. However, as to policy/statement key terms and specific operations, various types of academic publishers show great differences. The academic publishing community's response to the use of AI tools will still be in the stage of continuous exploration and debugging. All academic publishers should strengthen communication and coordination, actively formulate a policy framework to deal with the use of AI tools, and clarify the definitions, connotations, and boundaries of key policy elements and key terms. The academic community should be fully linked to build a policy system on the use of AI tools.