|国家预印本平台
首页|来氟米特治疗类风湿关节炎的Meta分析

来氟米特治疗类风湿关节炎的Meta分析

Efficacy of Leflunomide for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:系统评价国内来氟米特治疗类风湿关节炎的疗效。 方法:计算机检索CBM、VIP、CNKI 和WanFang Data,查找有关应用来氟米特治疗类风湿关节炎的随机对照试验(RCT),并追索纳入文献的参考文献。由2 名评价者独立选择试验、提取资料和评估方法学质量后,采用RevMan 5.3 软件进行Meta 分析。 结果:最终纳入6 个研究,共计1023例RA患者。Meta 分析结果显示:LEF在以下方面均优于MTX或其他对照组药物,且差异有统计学意义:C反应蛋白[MD=?4.29,95%CI(?0.32、8.27),P=0.03],肿胀关节数目[MD=?1.84,95%CI(?2.99、0.69),P=0.002]。而在血沉、晨僵时间及类风湿因子等方面差异无统计学意义。 结论:本Meta 分析结果提示,来氟米特优于对照组药物,但差异在许多疗效指标上无统计学意义。由于纳入研究样本量小且质量较低,上述结论尚需要高质量、大样本的随机盲法对照试验加以证实。

Objective: Evaluate the therapeutic effect of Leflunomide in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Methods: We searched WanFang, VIP, CNKI and Data CBM for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Meta analysis was carried out using RevMan 5.3 software with 2 reviewers independently selecting the test, extracting the data and assessing the quality of the method. Results: 6 studies were included. The results of Meta analysis showed that LEF was superior in terms of MTX or other drugs of control group, and the difference was statistically significant: C reactive protein [MD = - 4.29, 95%CI (- 0.32, 8.27), P=0.03], The number of swollen joints [MD = 1.84, 95%CI (- 2.99, 0.69), P=0.002]. No statistical significance in ESR, time of morning stiffness and rheumatoid factor differences. Conclusion: the results of the Meta analysis showed that the Leflunomide was superior to the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant in many therapeutic effects,. Because the sample size is small and the quality is low, the conclusion still needs to be confirmed by the high quality and large sample randomized blind controlled trial.

赵文甲、刘维

医药卫生理论医学研究方法内科学

来氟米特类风湿关节炎meta分析.

LeflunomideRheumatoid arthritisMeta analysis

赵文甲,刘维.来氟米特治疗类风湿关节炎的Meta分析[EB/OL].(2016-11-10)[2025-07-21].http://www.paper.edu.cn/releasepaper/content/201611-137.点此复制

评论