|国家预印本平台
首页|淮河水质水量联合调度风险分析

淮河水质水量联合调度风险分析

Risk Analysis of Water Quality and Quantity Joint Operation in Huaihe

中文摘要英文摘要

为了对淮河流域水质水量联合调度各方案进行风险分析,本文模拟了10个调度方案,包括实时调度方案,人机交互方案和优化调度方案,选取淮河流域两个主要污染物指标CODMn和NH3-N,分别计算各方案下两种水质指标超标风险率和超标程度,同时考虑调度过程中可能产生的防洪风险和供水风险,采用多目标模糊综合决策的方法,分别考虑上述2种水质6个指标,以水质监测断面界首、鲁台子和蚌埠闸为决策断面,计算得到7中情景下各方案的优劣排序。结果表明,实时调度方案2在各种情境下风险最小,为最优调度方案,人机交互方案(方案3、4和5)在各种情景下风险均比较大,为最劣方案。

In this paper, Joint water regulation of water quality in huaihe river basin in order to each project risk analysis, this paper simulates the 10 scheduling scheme, including real-time scheduling scheme, the human-computer interaction scheme and the optimization scheduling solution, choosing two main pollutant indexes in the huai river region CODMn and NH3 - N, each scheme are calculated respectively under the two kinds of excessive risk and excessive water quality indicators, also considering scheduling may be produced in the process of flood control and water supply risk, using multi-objective fuzzy comprehensive decision method, respectively, considering the above two kinds of quality, six factors to the water quality monitoring section claimed yesterday,Lutaizi and Bengbu gate for decision making, to calculate 7 scenarios in the order of each scheme. Results show that the real-time scheduling scheme 2 minimum risk under various scenarios, for optimal scheduling scheme of human-computer interaction program (scheme 3, 4, and 5) in a variety of scenarios are relatively risky, as the worst plan.

张翔、李良、吴绍飞

治河工程、防洪工程环境科学理论环境污染、环境污染防治

水利工程水质水量联合调度风险分析多目标模糊综合决策

hydraulic engineeringwater quality and quantity multi-operationrisk analysismulti-objective fuzzy comprehensive decision-making

张翔,李良,吴绍飞.淮河水质水量联合调度风险分析[EB/OL].(2013-08-13)[2025-08-11].http://www.paper.edu.cn/releasepaper/content/201308-121.点此复制

评论