块泽河拱坝泄流鼻坎型式的比较选择
OMPARISON AND SELECTION OF ARCH DAM BUCKET IN SKI-JUMP ENERGY DISSIPATION
基于块泽河拱坝表孔泄洪的模型实验,分析了连续坎和差动坎两种不同型式的鼻坎挑流消能效果。结果表明,在设计和校核洪水时,差动坎挑流消能能使水舌在空中更好的掺气、碰撞,消能效果更佳,在结合下游水垫塘消能的情况下,能大大减轻泄流对下游河床的冲刷破坏作用。
Based on the model test of flood discharge on surface sluice, the effects of continuous bucket and differential bucket on ski-jump energy dissipation were analyzed. The results indicated that nappe created by differential bucket is aerated and crashed better in the air, both in the cases of design flood and check flood. The effect of differential bucket on energy dissipation was better. The plunge pool, which absorbed remainder kinetic energy of overflow effectively, satisfied dissipation requirements both at design flood and check flood. The scouring and destroy action to downstream bed was decreased greatly by energy dissipation in plunge pool.
齐元田、黄细彬
水工结构
消能,连续坎,差动坎,时均动压,水垫塘
Energy dissipationContinuous bucketDifferential bucketTime-average pressurePlunge pool.
齐元田,黄细彬.块泽河拱坝泄流鼻坎型式的比较选择[EB/OL].(2006-03-24)[2025-08-29].http://www.paper.edu.cn/releasepaper/content/200603-444.点此复制
评论