基于ANSYS的L型挡土墙对比分析
L-shaped retaining wall comparative analysis based on ANSYS
L型挡土墙的墙身断面较小,重量轻,圬工量小,是一种较为常用的支挡结构。但是其支护高度有限。为了解决这个问题,工程师们提出了二级L型挡土墙这一支护结构。通过采用ANSYS有限元软件进行对比分析表明:在同等条件下,二级L型挡土墙的安全系数较高,且在外荷载作用下安全系数下降速度较慢;二级L型挡土墙偏向于整体滑动破坏,而L型挡土墙偏向于倾覆破坏;二级L型挡土墙类似于带有卸荷平台的倒F型挡土墙,具有明显的卸荷减压作用;二级L型挡土墙的基底压力较小,适用于软弱地基的高边坡支护工程;设计方面,二级L型挡土墙更加经济,结构更加轻便。
he cross section of the L-shaped retaining wall is small,light weight,small amount of masonry,which is a relatively common retaining structure.In order to solve this problem, the engineers proposed secondary l-shaped retaining wall supporting structure. using ANSYS finite element software shows that,under the same condition, the safety factor of the secondary L-shaped retaining wall is higher, and the outer loads safety coefficient decreased slower; Secondary L-shaped retaining walls tend to slip damage, however L-shaped retaining walls tend to overthrow;Secondary L-shaped retaining walls with unloading platform similar to pour F type retaining wall, have obvious unloading relief effect; Secondary L-shaped retaining walls of basement pressure is small, suitable for the high slope of weak foundation supporting engineering;Design aspect, the secondary L-shaped retaining wall is more economic and more lightweight structure.
潘海洋、朱建龙、刘小军、周仲华、谷俊杰
水工结构工程设计、工程测绘
二级L型挡土墙L型挡土墙NSYS安全系数土压力基底压力
Secondary L-shaped retaining wallsL-shaped retaining wallsANSYSSafety factorEarth pressureBasal pressure
潘海洋,朱建龙,刘小军,周仲华,谷俊杰.基于ANSYS的L型挡土墙对比分析[EB/OL].(2017-03-29)[2025-08-02].http://www.paper.edu.cn/releasepaper/content/201703-385.点此复制
评论