高质量学术期刊 OA 论文的分析研究——以 Web of Science 核心合集为例
Research on the OA Papers in High-quality Academic Journals: A Case Study ofWeb of Science Core Collection
目的 / 意义 ] 旨旨在全面了解开放获取论文的数量及开放获取率,并对其质量做出初步评价。[ 方法 / 过程 ] 以 Web of Science(WoS)核心合集为数据源,从年代、研究领域、国家(地区)、发文机构 4 个维度统计 2002-2016 年 15 年间被 WoS 收录的高质量学术期刊所发表的论文,进而分析解读 OA 论文的变化情况;最后以 Nature 为例,以篇均被引次数与高被引论文占比为切入点,对 OA 论文的质量作简要分析。[ 结果 / 结论 ] 全球 OA 论文数量逐年增长,尤以中国为典型代表;中国科学院是 WoS 平台收录论文最多的机构,2016 年其 OA 论文量占据首位,但 OA 率与主要欧美机构尚有一定差距;生物医学领域的 OA 实践效果优于其他研究领域。
Purpose/significance] This paper aims at getting a comprehensive understanding for thequantity and OA ratio of OA papers, and making a preliminary evaluation of these papers. [Method/process] In this paper, we utilized Web of Science Core Collection as the data source and took the fourdimensions: publication years, research areas, countries/territories and organizations. We investigatedpapers published in high-quality academic journals that recorded in WoS from 2002 to 2016. Then, weanalyzed and interpreted the changes and trends of OA papers. Finally, we took Nature as an exampleand analyzed the quality of OA papers from the perspective of citation per paper and highly-cited papersproportion. [Result/conclusion] The number of OA papers in the world have been increasing year byyear, especially in China. Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) is the institution which has the largestnumber of papers recorded in WoS, the number of OA papers took the first place in 2016, but the OAratio still lagged behind major European and American institutions. The OA practice in the field of biological and medical sciences is superior to other research fields.
朱江、任晓亚
dx.doi.org/10.13266/j.issn.2095-5472.2018.010
科学、科学研究信息传播、知识传播
开放获取Open AccessOA 率Web of Science高质量学术期刊
open accessOAOA ratioWeb of Sciencehigh-quality academic journal
朱江,任晓亚.高质量学术期刊 OA 论文的分析研究——以 Web of Science 核心合集为例[EB/OL].(2023-10-08)[2025-08-11].https://chinaxiv.org/abs/202310.00409.点此复制
评论