|国家预印本平台
首页|evereux幼儿评估量表第二版的中文修订

evereux幼儿评估量表第二版的中文修订

hinese Version of Devereux Early Childhood Assessment for Preschoolers Second Edition

中文摘要英文摘要

目的:修订第二版Devereux幼儿评估量表(DECA-P2),检验其中文版的信效度。方法:选取杭州市608名3~5岁幼儿为被试,由幼儿的教师完成DECA-P2中文版,以及校标学前行为与情绪量表(PreBERS)中文版、幼儿社会能力与行为评定简表(SCBE-30)中文版的测评,获得有效数据570份。结果:经项目分析筛选项目后进行探索性因素分析,得到与原量表一致的保护性因素结构,验证性因素分析显示Х2/df=2.50, RMESA=0.07, CFI=0.91, IFI=0.91。各分量表的Cronbach's α系数为0.80~0.93,分半信度为0.80~0.89,且与两校标量表显著相关。幼儿在总体保护性因素和行为问题分量表上存在显著的性别和年龄差异:女生的心理韧性发展水平高于男生,且有较少的问题行为;5岁幼儿的心理韧性发展水平高于3岁和4岁幼儿,且有较少的问题行为。结论:DECA-P2中文版具有良好的心理测量学指标,适用于在中国文化背景下评估3~5岁幼儿的心理韧性。

Objective: The Devereux Early Childhood Assessment for Preschoolers Second Edition (DECA-P2) was developed in 1996 and revised in 2012 by Paul A. LeBuffe and Jack A. Naglieri. DECA-P2 is mainly used to measure the resilience for children aged from 3 to 5. The purpose of this study is to investigate the applicability of DECA-P2 in China. Method: 608 preschoolers were rated by their teachers with the Chinese version of DECA-P2, Preschool Behavioral and Emotional Rating Scale (PreBERS) and Social Competence and Behavior Evaluation Scale-30 (SCBE-30). Data for 570 of 608 were valid. Result: For the subscale of Total Protective Factors, 2 of 27 items were excluded due to the low internal consistency. Exploratory factor analysis was performed on other 25 items with 50% of the valid data, which is selected randomly by the balance of age, gender and region. Using principal components analysis with varimax rotation, 21 items were kept for the factor loading of each item greater than 0.50 only on one factor, resulting in a three-factor solution (Initiative, Self-Regulation and Attachment/Relationships) which accounted for 59.82% of the variance. Another 50% of the valid data were analysed by the confirmatory factor analysis and results showed Х2/df=2.50, RMESA=0.07, CFI=0.91, IFI=0.91. The obtained configuration was the same as the original scale, and the sum of items in each factor could also form a corresponding subscale. Besides, the subscale of Behavior Concern consisted of 9 items because 2 of 11 items were excluded due to the low internal consistency. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of all subscales were between 0.80 and 0.93, and the split-half reliabilities of them were between 0.80 and 0.89. Each subscale had significant correlation with the two criterion scales. In addition, there were significant differences in age and gender for the two subscales of Total Protective Factors and Behavior Concern for Chinese preschoolers. The level of resilience of girls was higher than that of boys, and gils had less problem behaviors; the level of resilience of 5-aged preschoolers were higher than that of children aged 3 to 4, and 5-aged preschoolers had less problem behaviors as well. Conclusion: The Chinese version of DECA-P2 has acceptable psychometric quality and can be applied to evaluate resilience for children aged from 3 to 5 in China.

季雨竹、牛玉柏

教育科学、科学研究

发展与教育心理学ECA-P2心理韧性幼儿社会情绪能力信效度

evelopmental and Educational PsychologyDECA-P2resiliencepreschoolerssocial-emotioanl competencereliability and validity

季雨竹,牛玉柏.evereux幼儿评估量表第二版的中文修订[EB/OL].(2014-11-12)[2025-08-11].http://www.paper.edu.cn/releasepaper/content/201411-178.点此复制

评论