Exploring the contributions of self-efficacy and test anxiety to gender differences in assessments
Exploring the contributions of self-efficacy and test anxiety to gender differences in assessments
The observed performance difference between women and men on assessments in physics---the "gender gap"---is a significant and persistent inequity which has broad implications for the participation of women in physics. Research also shows that gender-based inequities extend to affective measures, such as self-efficacy. In this exploratory study, we report on gender disparities in self-efficacy and test anxiety and their relationship to assessment scores in our active-learning introductory physics course. Overall, gender-based differences in favour of men are observed in all our measures, with women having lower scores on measures associated with success (self-efficacy and assessment scores) and a higher score on a possibly detrimental affective factor (test anxiety). Using a multiple regression model-selection process to explore which measures may explain end-of-course Force Concept Inventory (FCI) and final exam scores, we find that the best fitting models include FCI pretest and self-efficacy as predictors, but do not include test anxiety.
Patrick J. Dubois、Jared B. Stang、Emily Altiere、Joss Ives
教育科学、科学研究
Patrick J. Dubois,Jared B. Stang,Emily Altiere,Joss Ives.Exploring the contributions of self-efficacy and test anxiety to gender differences in assessments[EB/OL].(2020-07-15)[2025-08-07].https://arxiv.org/abs/2007.07947.点此复制
评论