认知诊断模型的属性作用机制: R_RUM、NIDA与DINA比较
he mechanism of cognitive attributes effect on response of examinees: Comparison on R_RUM, NIDA and DINA model
通过Monte Carlo模拟实验,以属性作用机制(即认知属性是如何作用于或影响被试作答反应的机制)为视角,探讨R_RUM,NIDA和DINA三个认知诊断模型的属性作用机制、内在联系及其对诊断结果的影响,从而为实际运用者和研究者在模型的比较与选用上提供基础和借鉴。研究发现:三个模型的属性作用机制不尽相同,但又具有一定的内在联系,在一定的条件下三个模型具有等价性;三个模型的属性作用机制是影响认知诊断结果的重要因素;文中最后根据研究结果对认知诊断模型的选用提出了具体建议。
he Monte Carlo simulation method was used here. Three experiments conditions were considered. The first one was the uncontrolled the mechanism of cognitive attributes of the R_RUM, NIDA and DINA model; the second one was the controlled mechanism of compensated cognitive attributes; and the third one was the controlled mechanism of both compensated and equal weighted cognitive attributes. The findings reflected: (1)The difference in attribute operation routine was the key difference among the three models, and was also the critical factor resulting in different cognitive diagnosis consequences among the models.(2)There was some kind of relationship among the models. When the compensated operation was controlled, the effect was in equal between the R_RUM and DINA model.(3)When the attribute weights were further controlled, the effects of the models were equivalent.(4)If there is no controlling on attribute operation routines, the corrected match ratios of R_RUM and NIDA models were similar.
涂冬波、蔡艳
科学、科学研究教育数学
认知诊断模型机制R_RUMNIDA模型INA模型
cognitive diagnosisthe mechanism of cognitive attributesR_RUMNIDA modelDINA model
涂冬波,蔡艳.认知诊断模型的属性作用机制: R_RUM、NIDA与DINA比较[EB/OL].(2013-12-06)[2025-08-17].http://www.paper.edu.cn/releasepaper/content/201312-128.点此复制
评论