逆境胁迫对不同耐性大麦基因型籽粒植酸含量的影响
Influence of Abiotic Stress on Phytic Acid Content of Barley Genotypes Differing in Tolerance
以耐盐、耐酸、耐湿DH群体中分别选择耐性最强和最弱的5个株系,测定正常和胁迫条件下籽粒的植酸含量,研究大麦植酸含量对3种逆境胁迫的反应及不同耐性基因型之间的差异。结果表明,盐害胁迫显著降低大麦籽粒植酸含量,且胁迫下植酸含量的下降程度在不同株系间存在着很大的差异。酸土和湿害胁迫对大麦籽粒植酸含量无显著影响,显示出它们对大麦养分吸收及物质积累模式的影响与盐胁迫的影响不同。3种胁迫处理中,耐性株系和敏感株系在正常和胁迫2种生长环境下籽粒植酸含量均无显著差异,胁迫下大麦产量与籽粒植酸含量的相关性也不显著,说明大麦籽粒植酸含量的高低与这些非生物胁迫耐性的强弱并无内在联系。
Using 5 tolerant and 5 sensitive lines from each of three barley DH populations developed for evaluation and identification of salinity, acid soil, and waterlogging tolerance, the influence of salinity, acid soil and waterlogging stresses on phytic acid content was investigated. A significant reduction of phytic acid content in barley grains was observed when both types of barley lines were exposed to 200 mM NaCl. The decrease extent under salinity stress varied greatly with genotypes. Acid soil and waterlogging stresses did not caused significant changes in phytic acid content for both tolerant and sensitive lines, indicating that the effect of these two abiotic stresses on nutrient uptake and matter accumulation differs from that of salinity. In the three stresses, phytic acid content in both tolerant and sensitive lines showed no significant difference between the stress treatment and the control, and moreover there was no significant correlation between barley yield and phytic acid content. It may be assumed that phytic acid content in barley grains is not associated with abiotic stress tolerance.
毛盈、张国平、曾凡荣、裘波音、陈鑫
农作物植物学生理学
大麦植酸胁迫耐性
BarleyPhytic acidStressolerance
毛盈,张国平,曾凡荣,裘波音,陈鑫.逆境胁迫对不同耐性大麦基因型籽粒植酸含量的影响[EB/OL].(2010-01-06)[2025-08-02].http://www.paper.edu.cn/releasepaper/content/201001-194.点此复制
评论