介入治疗与保守治疗急性心肌梗死的长期疗效对照

Objective To investigate the interventional therapy and the long-term efficacy of conservative treatment of acutemyocardial infarction. Methods A total of 100 cases of patients with acute myocardial infarction in August 2013-August 2013at our hospital were retrospectively group studed. Conservative groups were performed with conservative treatment;intervention group were taken intervention treatment. We compared two groups of patients with anterior wall myocardialinfarction and inferior wall myocardial infarction, 1 year survival rate, incidence of cardiac events, and hospitalization rates;Before and after treatment 1 year cardiac function classification. Results In intervention group of patients with anterior wallmyocardial infarction, 1 year survival rate significantly higher than the conservative group, incidence of cardiac events, andhospitalization rates were significantly lower than the conservative group (P0.05). Two groups before treatment in patients with cardiac function classification had no significant difference (P>0.05). Inintervention group of anterior wall myocardial infarction, cardiac function 1 year after treatment grade were significant betterthan the conservative group (P0.05). Conclusion Interventionaltreatment and conservative treatment of acute inferior wall myocardial infarction, the long-term efficacy of similar, but thelong-term efficacy of anterior wall myocardial infarction, the effectiveness of interventional treatment is better.It can improvethe survival rate, reduce the incidence of adverse cardiac events and hospitalization rates.It improves cardiac function inpatients, which is worth promoting.