|国家预印本平台
首页|隧道CRD法不同开挖进尺对围岩稳定的对比研究

隧道CRD法不同开挖进尺对围岩稳定的对比研究

he comparative study on the impact of tunnel excavation with footage different CRD to testability of surrounding rock

中文摘要英文摘要

本文采用岩土工程通用软件FLAC3D对隧道CRD法1.5m、2.0m、2.5 m、3.0 m进尺施工分别进行了三维数值模拟,分析了不同进尺施工对隧道围岩稳定的影响。文中选取了某一实际隧道工程为研究对象,通过对不同开挖进尺的施工模拟计算,对比分析了不同进尺下施工隧道围岩位移、应力分布以及塑性区大小的规律与特点。研究结果表明,①从围岩应力控制方面考虑,1.5m进尺围岩应力控制效果最好,其次为2.0m、2.5 m、3.0 m;②从围岩塑性区大小考虑,1.5m进尺控制效果最好,其次依次为2.0m、2.5 m、3.0 m;③从围岩位移控制方面考虑,1.5米进尺围岩控制效果最好,而2.0米、2.5米和3.0米相差不大。

his article used Geotechnical Engineering General Software FLAC3D to simulate the tunnel CRD method 1.5m, 2.0m, 2.5 m, 3.0 m footage separately, and analysis the influence to the tunnel surrounding rock stability in the different footage construction. This paper selected a real tunnel project as the research object and analysis comparatively the rule and characteristic of various methods of tunnel surrounding rock displacement, stress distribution and the plastic zone size through simulated computing the different footage construction. The results show that,①Considered from the surrounding rock stress control that the 1.5m footage adjacent formation stress adjustment effect is best, next is 2.0m, 2.5 m, 3.0 m;②Considered from the plastic zone size that the 1.5m footage control effect is best, next is in turn 2.0m, 2.5 m, 3.0 m;③Considered from the surrounding rock displacement control that 1.5 meter footage adjacent formation control effect is best, but 2.0 meter, 2.5 meters and 3.0 meter phase differences are not big.

赵耀强、林志斌、刘庆方

矿山建设、矿山设计矿山压力、矿山支护

RD工法隧道开挖进尺围岩位移围岩应力

RD methodunnelExcavates the footagesurrounding rock displacementsurrounding rock stress distribution

赵耀强,林志斌,刘庆方.隧道CRD法不同开挖进尺对围岩稳定的对比研究[EB/OL].(2010-01-26)[2025-08-02].http://www.paper.edu.cn/releasepaper/content/201001-1125.点此复制

评论