|国家预印本平台
首页|冠心病患者心脏康复相关指南的系统评价

冠心病患者心脏康复相关指南的系统评价

Residents’Intention Status and the Influencing Factors for Stroke High-risk Screening in Guangdong

中文摘要英文摘要

背景心脏康复作为冠心病患者康复的有效干预措施已达成共识,但国内外制定的心脏康复相关指南的质量尚不明确,相关的推荐意见有待整合。目的系统评价冠心病患者心脏康复的相关指南,为临床实践提供参考。方法 计算机检索中英文数据库、国内外指南网和相关学会网,搜集冠心病患者心脏康复的相关指南,检索时限均设为建库至2022年6月30日。2名研究者按照纳入和排出标准独立筛选文献并提取资料。采用AGREEⅡ对纳入指南进行质量评价,并汇总冠心病患者心脏康复的推荐意见。结果最终纳入10部指南,8部来源于国外,指南发布时间为2011-2020年。纳入指南AGREEⅡ各领域平均得分为:范围和目的71%、参与人员65%、严谨性58%、清晰性80%、应用性64%、独立性45%,4部指南推荐级别为A级,6部指南推荐级别为B级。主要推荐意见汇总为心脏康复基本要求、健康教育、危险因素控制、心理支持、运动训练及促进患者参与心脏康复6个方面。结论指南的质量处于中等至较高水平,在参与人员、严谨性、应用性、独立性领域仍需提高;各指南推荐意见趋于一致,但在促进患者参与心脏康复方面意见仍显不足;我国心脏康复指南质量水平与国外相比仍存差距,应构建适用于我国冠心病患者的高质量心脏康复循证指南。

BackgroundCardiac rehabilitation as an effective comprehensiveintervention for patients with coronary heart disease has reached consensus, but the quality of guidelines related to cardiac rehabilitation developed at home and abroad is still unclear, and relevant recommendations need to be integrated.ObjectiveTo systematically review the guidelineson cardiac rehabilitation in patientswith coronary heart disease. Methods The academic databases , guideline repositoriesandassociation websites were electronically searched forrelated guidelines on cardiac rehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease from database established to 30 June 2022. Literatures screening, data extraction and guidelines evaluation were independently performed by two researchers,respectively according tothe inclusion and exclusion criteria and The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation (AGREE )and the recommendations related cardiac rehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease were then compared and summarized. Results Tenguidelines with publication time ranging from 2011 to 2020 were eventually included and eight of them were foreign ones. The average scoreof every AGREE domain was 71%for scope and purpose, 65%for stakeholder involvement, 58%for rigor of development, 80%for clarity of presentation, 64%for applicability, and 45%for editorial independence. Four guidelines were rated as Grade A and the remaining six as Grade B. Sixaspects were involved in recommendations, including basic requirements of cardiac rehabilitation, heath education, risk factors control, psychological support, exercise training, andimprove cardiac rehabilitation participation. Conclusion The qualityof included guidelines is at a moderate to high level. More effortsareneeded to improve the domains in stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, applicability, and editorial independence.Recommendations of the ten guidelines tend to be consistent, but there are still insufficient recommendations in improving cardiac rehabilitation participation. At present, there is a gap in the quality of guidelines on cardiac rehabilitationbetweenChina and foreign countries, so it is necessary to develop a high-quality guideline on cardiac rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease in China.

刘晶涛, 苏荷, 秦小金, 兰云霞, 张金枝

10.12074/202210.00116V1

内科学医学研究方法预防医学

冠心病心脏康复指南系统评价

刘晶涛, 苏荷, 秦小金, 兰云霞, 张金枝.冠心病患者心脏康复相关指南的系统评价[EB/OL].(2022-10-17)[2025-08-16].https://chinaxiv.org/abs/202210.00116.点此复制

评论