最优气候值法与ARIMA模型在气温预报中比较研究
he comparing research of Optimal Climate Normal and ARIMA model in the prediction of temperature
根据延安1961-2000年共40年的七月份月平均气温数据资料分别利用最优气候值法与差分自回归移动平均法(ARIMA)对延安2001-2004年七月份月平均气温值做预报。结果表明:最优气候值法与ARIMA模型用于气温预报时,二者都表现出一定的预报能力,但最优气候值法相对于ARIMA模型有更高的预报精度,其中最优气候值法对气温预报的误差绝对值最大不超过1.800℃,而ARIMA模型的误差绝对值最大为2.317℃,但对于极端气温的预报,后者的预报效果较好。除预报方法自身客观的局限性外,这样的结果可能与选择的地区和时间有关,所以对于不同的时空,选择不同的预测方法,将会得到不同的预报结果,这就要求必须有针对性地选择预测方法以便取得最佳的预测效果。
he paper applies optimal climate normal and ARIMA model to separately forecast the average temperature of July from 2001---2004 of YanAN according to the date of YanAn forty years (1961---2000). The result shows that both optimal climate normal method and ARIMA model perform well in temperature prediction, especially compared to the ARIMA model, the optimal climate normal method had higher prediction accuracy. The max absolute error of the optimal climate normal method is just only 1.800℃, but the max absolute error of the ARIMA model is 2.317 ℃, however, the ARIMA model was better for extreme temperature prediction. Except for the objective limitation of forecasting method, choosing different areas and different periods of time might result in prediction consequences. That is to say, for a different time and space point, different forecasting methods would produce different forecasting results, which required to adopt a pertinent forecasting method in order to obtain the best prediction.
李双、李晖、王君兰、郭小燕
大气科学(气象学)
关最优气候值法RIMA模型气温预报PS
optimal climate normal methodRIMA modelthe prediction of temperaturePS
李双,李晖,王君兰,郭小燕.最优气候值法与ARIMA模型在气温预报中比较研究[EB/OL].(2010-05-20)[2025-08-10].http://www.paper.edu.cn/releasepaper/content/201005-514.点此复制
评论