|国家预印本平台
首页|中医药治疗重症肌无力随机对照试验结局指标选用现状研究

中医药治疗重症肌无力随机对照试验结局指标选用现状研究

urrent Status of the Selection of Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials of Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of Myasthenia Gravis

中文摘要英文摘要

背景 中药和针刺等中医药疗法在重症肌无力的治疗中广泛应用,但缺乏高质量的循证医学证据验证其有效性和安全性,原因之一是试验设计中缺乏公认统一的结局指标,进而导致在开展meta分析等二次研究时由于指标不同而无法合并数据。构建中医药治疗重症肌无力的核心结局指标集有助于临床研究设计与高质量循证证据积累。目的 描述中医药治疗重症肌无力随机对照试验结局指标选用现状,分析存在的问题并提出建议,推动构建中医药核心结局指标集。方法 全面检索中英文数据库,筛选中医药治疗重症肌无力的随机对照试验,提取结局指标信息,分类并统计频次,划分指标域,分析存在的问题并提出相应建议。结果 检索8大数据库,共纳入文献186篇,各项结局指标累计使用724次,分为7个大类:重症肌无力严重程度量表、重症肌无力生活质量量表、中医证候积分、安全性指标、血生化指标、肌力变化、其他。存在结局指标主次区分不明确、缺少国际公认指标、安全性不够重视、结局指标数量与评价时间点差异大、评价存在偏倚、未纳入卫生经济学评价、中医疗效评价标准不规范等问题。 结论 根据存在的问题,提出推动构建中医药治疗重症肌无力临床研究核心结局指标集、选择国际公认的结局指标与安全性指标并明确主次、选择合适的治疗周期与评价时间点、临床研究注册、实施盲法、规范报告等具体建议。

Background Chinese herbal medicine and acupuncture are widely used in the treatment of myasthenia gravis, but there is a lack of high-quality evidence to verify its effectiveness and safety. One of the reasons is the lack of recognized and unified outcome indicators in the trial design, which leads to the inability to combine data in secondary studies such as meta-analysis. The construction of the core outcome set of traditional Chinese medicine for myasthenia gravis is conducive to the design of clinical research and the accumulation of high-quality evidence. Objective To describe the current situation of outcome selection in randomized controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of myasthenia gravis, analyze the existing problems and put forward suggestions. Methods Comprehensively search the Chinese and English databases, screen the randomized controlled trials of traditional Chinese medicine in the treatment of myasthenia gravis, extract the outcome information, classify and count the frequency, divide the index domain, analyze the selection characteristics and existing problems, and put forward suggestions. Results Eight databases were searched and 186 literatures were included. The outcomes were used for 724 times in total, which were divided into seven categories: myasthenia gravis severity scale, myasthenia gravis quality of life scale, TCM syndrome score, safety index, blood biochemical index, muscle strength change and others. There are some problems in outcome selection, such as unclear primary and secondary distinction, lack of internationally recognized outcomes, insufficient attention to safety, large difference between quantity and evaluation time point, bias in evaluation, not included in health economics evaluation, non-standard evaluation standard of curative effect and so on. Conclusion According to the existing problems, specific suggestions were put forward as follow: promote the construction of the core outcome set of clinical research on the treatment of myasthenia gravis with traditional Chinese medicine, select internationally recognized primary and secondary outcomes, select appropriate treatment duration and evaluation time points, register clinical trials, use blind method, and standardized report writing.

彭思扬, 李少红, 田煜坤, 孟令昊, 方瑞英, 朱文增

10.12114/j.issn.1007-9572.2022.0738

中医学医学研究方法神经病学、精神病学

myasthenia gravisoutcometraditional Chinese medicine

彭思扬, 李少红, 田煜坤, 孟令昊, 方瑞英, 朱文增.中医药治疗重症肌无力随机对照试验结局指标选用现状研究[EB/OL].(2022-10-28)[2025-08-09].https://chinaxiv.org/abs/202211.00051.点此复制

评论