内设加劲肋的冷弯方形钢管柱试验研究与分析
Experimental study and associated analysis of inner-stiffened cold-formed SHS steel columns
本文通过轴压试验研究了壁厚相对较大的冷弯钢管短柱的受压性能。10根方形空心钢管短柱试件涉及6mm和10mm两种壁厚,短柱名义长度位600mm。本文对4种不同加劲肋的布置方式的短柱进行试验,研究了加劲肋对短柱的受压性能试验结果的影响;同时对冷弯截面不同部位截取的板件进行了拉伸试验,以得到受加工影响后的材料主要强度。试验所得的截面强度还与现行相关规范即美国AIS规范和中国规范GB50018-2002考虑冷弯强度提高影响后的计算强度进行了比较分析,结果发现前者规范略为保守,后者规范则略偏于不安全,但总体上二者与试验值的差异均在可接受范围内,且均适用于计算设置加劲肋后的方形钢管截面强度。
xial compression tests were conducted to investigate the compressive behaviour of cold-formed steel stub columns with relatively thick walls. Totally 10 square hollow section (SHS) specimens with wall thickness varied from 6mm to 10mm and nominal tubular length of 600mm were tested. Four inner-stiffener arrangements were considered to study the effects of the stiffeners on the behavior of the tubular specimens. A series of tensile coupons were cut from the cold-formed SHSs at different characteristic areas to obtain a full picture of the enhanced material properties due to the cold-forming process. The achieved sectional stresses from the SHS column experiments were compared with the predicted stresses using methods specified in relevant design codes, AISI and Chinese GB codes in particular, taking into account the enhanced material strength of the cold-formed steel. It is found out that the AISI method is slightly conservative in predicting the sectional stress of the specimens, whereas the GB method slightly overestimates the stress capacity. In general, both methods produce an acceptable prediction of the actual sectional stress, and they both tend to result in a better prediction for specimens with inner stiffeners.
朱爱珠、朱宏平、陆勇
材料科学工程基础科学
冷弯钢管柱轴压试验截面承载力内置加劲肋
old-formed steel columnAxial compression testSectional capacityInner stiffener
朱爱珠,朱宏平,陆勇.内设加劲肋的冷弯方形钢管柱试验研究与分析[EB/OL].(2014-09-30)[2025-08-16].http://www.paper.edu.cn/releasepaper/content/201409-402.点此复制
评论