Evolution of risk assessment strategies for food and feed uses of stacked GM events

p>Data requirements are not harmonized globally for the regulation of food and feed derived from stacked genetically modified (GM) events, produced by combining individual GM events through conventional breeding. The data required by some regulatory agencies have increased despite the absence of substantiated adverse effects to animals or humans from the consumption of GM crops. Data from studies conducted over a 15-year period for several stacked GM event maize (<em>Zea mays</em> L.) products (Bt11?×? GA21, Bt11?×? MIR604, MIR604?×? GA21, Bt11?×? MIR604?×? GA21, Bt11?×? MIR162?×? GA21 and Bt11?×? MIR604?×? MIR162?×? GA21), together with their component single events, are presented. These data provide evidence that no substantial changes in composition, protein expression or insert stability have occurred after combining the single events through conventional breeding. An alternative food and feed risk assessment strategy for stacked GM events is suggested based on a problem formulation approach that utilizes (i) the outcome of the single event risk assessments, and (ii) the potential for interactions in the stack, based on an understanding of the mode of action of the transgenes and their products.</p></div