针刺治疗紧张型头痛的疗效及安全性的Meta分析
Meta analysis on efficacy and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of Tension-Type Headache
目的:系统评价针刺治疗紧张型头痛的疗效及安全性。方法:检索Pub Med、Cochrane Library、Embase、Web of Science、中国知网、万方、维普、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)自2012年1月至2021年12月中关于针刺治疗紧张型头痛的随机对照试验。使用Revman5.3,辅以STATA17.0对数据结局指标总有效率和VAS评分进行Meta分析。结果:最终纳入13篇文献,累计样本量918例。META分析结果:西药组:总有效率 RR=1.20,Z = 4.24 ( P<0. 0001 ) ;VAS评分 SMD = 0.64,Z =4.61( P<0.00001 ),针刺效果均优于西药。传统/常规针刺组:总有效率 RR = 1.21,Z =3.62( P=0. 0003<0.05 );VAS评分SMD=0.33,Z =2.77( P=0. 006<0.05 ),特殊针刺疗效均优于传统/常规针刺。Egger检验法:总有效率:西药组P=0.264>0.05,表示无发表偏倚;传统/常规针刺组P= 0.012<0.05,表示有发表偏倚;VAS评分:西药组P = 0.943>0.05,表示无发表偏倚;传统/常规针刺组P=0.633>0.05,表示无发表偏倚。结论:针刺治疗TTH在疗效与安全性上都优于西药。新兴针刺手法相较于传统/常规针刺有着更好的疗效。
Objective:To analyze and evaluate the efficacy and safety of acupuncture in the treatment of tension-type headache.Methods:By retrieving documents on the randomized controlled trials of acupuncture in the treatment of Tension-type Headache in Pub Med, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, web of science, CNKI, Wanfang, VIP and CBM dating from January 2012 to December 2021, two researchers.Meta-analyzed data\'s outcome indicators of total effective rate and VAS score with Revman5.3 and STATA17.0. Results: Under the guidance of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 13 literatures were finally included, with a cumulative sample size of 918 cases. After meta analysis, the following results were obtained: Western medicine group: Total effective rate group:RR = 1.20, z = 4.24 (P < 0.0001);VAS score group: SMD = 0.64, z = 4.61 (P < 0.00001),show that curative effect of acupuncture was better than that of Western medicine. In the traditional / conventional acupuncture group:Total effective rate group:RR = 1.21, z = 3.62 (P = 0.0003 < 0.05);VAS score group:SMD = 0.33, z = 2.77 (P = 0.006 < 0.05),show that curative effect of special acupuncture was better than that of traditional / conventional acupuncture. Egger regression test: total effective rate: Western medicine group P = 0.264 > 0.05, indicating no publication bias; In the traditional / routine acupuncture group, P = 0.012 < 0.05, indicating publication bias; VAS score: Western medicine group P = 0.943 > 0.05, indicating no publication bias; Traditional / routine acupuncture group P = 0.633 > 0.05, indicating no publication bias.Conclusion: In the treatment of TTH, acupuncture is superior to western medicine both in efficacy and safety. Meanwhile, many new acupuncture manipulation techniques have better curative effects than traditional / conventional acupuncture. It is clear that acupuncture has a great development space in clinics.
图娅、尹月、陆永辉、姜会梨、张腾
中医学医学研究方法神经病学、精神病学
针刺疗法紧张型头痛有效性安全性meta分析
acupuncturetension-type headacheefficacysafetymeta-analysis
图娅,尹月,陆永辉,姜会梨,张腾.针刺治疗紧张型头痛的疗效及安全性的Meta分析[EB/OL].(2022-04-19)[2025-08-16].http://www.paper.edu.cn/releasepaper/content/202204-225.点此复制
评论