科学计量研究中全计数法与分数计数法研究综述
Review on Full Counting Method and Fractional Counting Method in Scientometric Research
[目的/意义]对科学计量研究中计数方法的相关概念进行界定,构建计数方法分类体系,梳理比较计数方法的特征和差异,分析现存问题并提出未来改进的方向和选择计数方法的建议。[方法/过程] 首先概括计数方法的组成要素和使用流程,从信誉值分配的角度提出计数方法分类的两个要素,将计数方法分为全计数法与分数计数法两大类,并对各方法进行概述;以全计数与分数计数法的等权算法——full counts与fractional counts为例,从论文指标、引文指标、网络指标3个视角,比较计数方法的差异。[结果/结论] 文章对于全计数与分数计数方法的优劣势、计数单元与计数对象的一致性、信誉值分配规则合理性、网络影响力测度4个方面的问题进行了思考,指出在未来上述4个方面进一步研究的方向。
Purpose/significance] This paper systematically defines the related concepts of counting methods and establishes the counting methods classification. Then, it concludes the characteristics and differences of counting methods, analyzes the existing problems and proposes some suggestions for the future improvement and selection of counting methods.[Method/process] Firstly, the paper generalized the elements and the process of counting methods, proposed two classified factors of counting methods from the perspective of credit allocation, including full counts and fractional counts, and then, we summarized the two methods. Secondly, the paper took full counts and factional counts as an example to compare the differences between two types of methods from three perspectives included publication indicators, citation indicators and network indicators.[Result/conclusion] Finally, we develop a brief description of existing problems, which include the advantages and disadvantages of full counts and fractional counts, the consistency between the basic unit and count object, the rationality of credit allocation and measurement of network impact. Besides, we point out the further research space of the above problems.
丁洁兰、杨立英、陈莉玥
科学、科学研究自然科学研究方法
计数方法全计数法分数计数法
counting methodsfull counting methodfractional counting method
丁洁兰,杨立英,陈莉玥.科学计量研究中全计数法与分数计数法研究综述[EB/OL].(2023-08-27)[2025-08-02].https://chinaxiv.org/abs/202308.00470.点此复制
评论